Court ruling not needed to withdraw care

Mr Justice Jackson has ruled that legal permission will no longer be required to end care for patients in a permanent vegetative state.

Under specific circumstance, such as a patient signing a ‘do not resuscitate’ agreement, doctors can withdraw treatment from a patient. However, the law was different for removing sustenance from an individual in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Previously, a judge needed to have given consent to withdraw nutrition from a patient.

Now the landmark decision will change that process, paving the way for a change in the way such cases are handled by hospitals.

Sarah Wootton, chief executive of the campaign group Compassion in Dying, said: “When all parties - family, the hospital and treating doctors - are agreed on what someone would have wanted for their care, it seems absurd to require a costly court process to confirm this."

An appeal is expected from the official solicitor.

Event Diary

This story was first published in digitalhealth.net

Supplier Profiles

CDC success at Victoria Infirmary, Northwich creates ideal model for future patient pathway reforms

Northwich’s Victoria Infirmary (VIN) Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) has enabled more patients

Gain valuable insight with Adveco for gas to electric decarbonisation projects

Adveco, the commercial hot water specialist, announces the launch of live metering of domestic ho