This story was first published in digitalhealth.net

The Public Accounts Committee has said it is not clear whether the contribution of NHS Test and Trace in reducing infection levels can justify its ‘unimaginable’ costs.
NHS Test and Trace was set up in May 2020 with a budget of £22 billion. Since then it has been allocated £15 billion more: totalling £37 billion over two years. The Department of Health & Social Care justified the scale of investment, in part, on the basis that an effective test and trace system would help avoid a second national lockdown - but since its creation we have had two more lockdowns.
Now, in a slamming report, Public Accounts Committee has said that the system must ‘wean itself off its persistent reliance on consultants’, as there remains no clear evidence of it’s overall effectiveness, nor whether its contribution to reducing infection levels - as opposed to the other measures introduced to tackle the pandemic - can justify the money spent on it.
Although the speed and scale of its rollout was commended, the committee said that Test and Trace has never met the target to turn around all tests in face-to-face settings in 24 hours. Low utilisation rates - well below the target of 50 per cent - persisted into October last year.
Furthermore, a major focus for the programme in early 2021 was the mass roll-out of rapid testing in different community settings, but there have been particular setbacks for the roll-out to schools, after Test and Trace had significantly underestimated the increase in demand for testing when schools and universities returned last September.
Meg Hillier MP, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said: "The £23 billion test and trace has cost us so far is about the annual budget of the Department for Transport. Test and Trace still continues to pay for consultants at £1000 a day. Yet despite the unimaginable resources thrown at this project Test and Trace cannot point to a measurable difference to the progress of the pandemic, and the promise on which this huge expense was justified - avoiding another lockdown – has been broken, twice.
“DHSC and NHST&T must rapidly turn around these fortunes and begin to demonstrate the worth and value of this staggering investment of taxpayers' money. Not only is it essential it delivers an effective system as pupils return to school and more people return to their workplace, but for the £billions spent we need to see a top class legacy system. British taxpayers cannot be treated by government like an ATM machine. We need to see a clear plan and costs better controlled."
This story was first published in digitalhealth.net
UK Building Regulations highlight toxic gas and smoke from layers of paint built up over multiple redecorations as a major cause of permanent ill health or death in a building fire.
Their concern rose with discovery the flame retardant paints most widely used paint along escape routes have been ones which to this day counter-productively use emission of heavy toxic gas to smother flames which rapidly spread along walls if layers of paint delaminate in a fire.
Northwich’s Victoria Infirmary (VIN) Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) has enabled more patients
Adveco, the commercial hot water specialist, announces the launch of live metering of domestic ho
Sarah Greenslade, public affairs and communications officer at the British Parking Association looks at some of the problems and innovations in healthcare parking
It’s easy to assume that the comms team is there to handle press enquiries and the occasional social media storm – but the reality is that strategic communications can make a measurable impact across the entire organisation, from operational to financial, when done properly